In some case of __slab_free(), we need a lock for manipulating partial list. If freeing object with a lock is failed, a lock doesn't needed anymore for some reasons. Case 1. prior is NULL, kmem_cache_debug(s) is true In this case, another free is occured before our free is succeed. When slab is full(prior is NULL), only possible operation is slab_free(). So in this case, we guess another free is occured. It may make a slab frozen, so lock is not needed anymore. Case 2. inuse is NULL In this case, acquire_slab() is occured before out free is succeed. We have a last object for slab, so other operation for this slab is not possible except acquire_slab(). Acquire_slab() makes a slab frozen, so lock is not needed anymore. Above two reason explain why we don't need a lock when freeing object with a lock is failed. So, when cmpxchg_double_slab() is failed, releasing a lock is more suitable. This may reduce lock contention. This also make logic somehow simple that 'was_frozen with a lock' case is never occured. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@xxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 531d8ed..3e0b9db 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -2438,7 +2438,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *prior; void **object = (void *)x; int was_frozen; - int inuse; struct page new; unsigned long counters; struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL; @@ -2450,13 +2449,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, return; do { + if (unlikely(n)) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags); + n = NULL; + } prior = page->freelist; counters = page->counters; set_freepointer(s, object, prior); new.counters = counters; was_frozen = new.frozen; new.inuse--; - if ((!new.inuse || !prior) && !was_frozen && !n) { + if ((!new.inuse || !prior) && !was_frozen) { if (!kmem_cache_debug(s) && !prior) @@ -2481,7 +2484,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, } } - inuse = new.inuse; } while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page, prior, counters, @@ -2507,25 +2509,17 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, return; } + if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial > s->min_partial)) + goto slab_empty; + /* - * was_frozen may have been set after we acquired the list_lock in - * an earlier loop. So we need to check it here again. + * Objects left in the slab. If it was not on the partial list before + * then add it. */ - if (was_frozen) - stat(s, FREE_FROZEN); - else { - if (unlikely(!inuse && n->nr_partial > s->min_partial)) - goto slab_empty; - - /* - * Objects left in the slab. If it was not on the partial list before - * then add it. - */ - if (unlikely(!prior)) { - remove_full(s, page); - add_partial(n, page, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL); - stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL); - } + if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && unlikely(!prior)) { + remove_full(s, page); + add_partial(n, page, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL); + stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags); return; -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>