On (24/01/15 08:47), Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > At this point I NACK this patch. We're about to submit an allocator > > which is clearly better that z3fold and is faster that zsmalloc in > > most cases and that submission will mark z3fold as deprecated. But for > > now this move is premature. > > I think unless there are current users of z3fold that cannot use > zsmalloc, the introduction of a new allocator should be irrelevant to > deprecating z3fold. Do you know of such users? Can you explain why > zsmalloc is not usable for them? I second this. I believe "do we know whether z3fold has users" is a legit question that means no offense.
