[PATCH v2] Fix error handling in begin_new_exec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If get_unused_fd_flags() fails, the error handling is incomplete
because bprm->cred is already set to NULL, and therefore
free_bprm will not unlock the cred_guard_mutex.
Note there are two error conditions which end up here,
one before and one after bprm->cred is cleared.

Fixes: b8a61c9e7b4a ("exec: Generic execfd support")

Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/exec.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

v2: rebased to v6.7, retested and updated the commit message
to fix a checkpatch.pl style nit about the too short sha1 hash
in the Fixes: statement.
And retained Eric's Acked-by from:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87mts2kcrm.fsf@disp2133/


Thanks
Bernd.

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 4aa19b24f281..6d9ed2d765ef 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1408,6 +1408,9 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
 
 out_unlock:
 	up_write(&me->signal->exec_update_lock);
+	if (!bprm->cred)
+		mutex_unlock(&me->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
+
 out:
 	return retval;
 }
-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux