On 1/12/24 12:28, Tom Lendacky wrote: > I thought there was also a desire to remove the direct map for any pages > assigned to a guest as private, not just the case that the comment says. > So updating the comment would probably the best action. I'm not sure who desires that. It's sloooooooow to remove things from the direct map. There's almost certainly a frequency cutoff where running the whole direct mapping as 4k is better than the cost of mapping/unmapping. Actually, where _is_ the TLB flushing here?
