On 11/01/2024 18:04, John Hubbard wrote: > On 1/11/24 09:32, Ryan Roberts wrote: > ... >>> I have all the information to create a hugetlb-specific set of counters, so its >>> not lumped in with page cache memory. You would then have counter sets of >>> "anon", "file" and "htlb". Would that be useful? >> >> Or I could just filter out hugetlb memory so it doesn't appear in this tool at >> all? That would be easier implementation-wise, and probably more in line with >> the original intention of the tool (it's called thpmaps, after all). >> > > That does seem better. And I spend a fair amount of time explaining to > end users that hugetlbfs != THP, so that would also avoid aggravating that > problem as well. > Implemented for v3 > > thanks,
