Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:46:29PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Concurrent access to a global vmap space is a bottle-neck.
> We can simulate a high contention by running a vmalloc test
> suite.
> 
> To address it, introduce an effective vmap node logic. Each
> node behaves as independent entity. When a node is accessed
> it serves a request directly(if possible) from its pool.
> 
> This model has a size based pool for requests, i.e. pools are
> serialized and populated based on object size and real demand.
> A maximum object size that pool can handle is set to 256 pages.
> 
> This technique reduces a pressure on the global vmap lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>

Why not use a llist for this? That gets rid of the need for a
new pool_lock altogether...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux