> >> I'm not sure it's the possible to resolve the concerns with "static" here >> since "allownodes" will be cleared for each call to show_free_areas(). >> >> static nodemask_t allownodes; >> > >There's nothing protecting concurrent access to it. This function >certainly isn't in a performance sensitive path so I would be inclined to >just leave it as is. > Ok. Thanks for comment, David. Thanks, Gavin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>