On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:13:43AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > It clearly solves a problem (and the one I think it's solving is the > size of the FTL map). But I can't see why we should stop working on it, > just because not all drive manufacturers want to support it. I don't think it is drive vendors. It is is the SSD divisions which all pretty much love it (for certain use cases) vs the UFS/eMMC divisions which tends to often be fearful and less knowledgeable (to say it nicely) no matter what vendor you're talking to.