> On Dec 21, 2023, at 06:44, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hugetlb rmap handling differs quite a lot from "ordinary" rmap code. > For example, hugetlb currently only supports entire mappings, and treats > any mapping as mapped using a single "logical PTE". Let's move it out > of the way so we can overhaul our "ordinary" rmap. > implementation/interface. > > So let's introduce and use hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() to make all > hugetlb handling use dedicated hugetlb_* rmap functions. > > Add sanity checks that we end up with the right folios in the right > functions. > > Note that is_device_private_page() does not apply to hugetlb. > > Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks.
