Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.12.23 16:05, Ryan Roberts wrote:
On 20/12/2023 14:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]



gcc version 13.2.1 20231011 (Red Hat 13.2.1-4) (GCC)

  From Fedora 38. So "a bit" newer :P


I'll retry with newer toolchain.

FWIW, with the code fix and the original compiler:

Fork, order-0, Apple M2:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      0.8% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |       1.3% |      2.0% |
| fork-batching         |       4.3% |      1.0% |

Fork, order-9, Apple M2:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      0.8% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |       0.9% |      0.9% |
| fork-batching         |     -37.3% |      1.0% |

Fork, order-0, Ampere Altra:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      0.7% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |       3.2% |      0.7% |
| fork-batching         |       5.5% |      1.1% |

Fork, order-9, Ampere Altra:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      0.1% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |       0.5% |      0.1% |
| fork-batching         |     -10.4% |      0.1% |


I just gave it another quick benchmark run on that Intel system.

hugetlb-rmap-cleanups -> fork-batching

order-0: 0.014114 -> 0.013848

-1.9%

order-9: 0.014262 -> 0.009410

-34%

Note that I disable SMT and turbo, and pin the test to one CPU, to make the
results as stable as possible. My kernel config has anything related to
debugging disabled.


And with gcc 13.2 on arm64:

Fork, order-0, Apple M2 VM:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      1.5% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |      -3.3% |      1.1% |
| fork-batching         |      -3.6% |      1.4% |

Fork, order-9, Apple M2 VM:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      1.8% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |      -5.8% |      1.3% |
| fork-batching         |     -38.1% |      2.3% |

Fork, order-0, Ampere Altra:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      1.3% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |      -0.1% |      0.4% |
| fork-batching         |      -0.4% |      0.5% |

Fork, order-9, Ampere Altra:
| kernel                |   mean_rel |   std_rel |
|:----------------------|-----------:|----------:|
| mm-unstable           |       0.0% |      0.1% |
| hugetlb-rmap-cleanups |      -0.1% |      0.1% |
| fork-batching         |     -13.9% |      0.1% |


So all looking good. Compiler was the issue. Sorry for the noise.

No need to be sorry, good that we figured out what's going wrong here.

Weird that the compiler makes such a difference here.


So please go ahead with you rmap v2 stuff, and I'll wait for you to post the
fork and zap batching patches properly, then rebase my arm64 contpte stuff on
top and remeasure everything.

Yes, will get rmap v2 out soon, then start working on fork, and then try tackling zap. I have some holiday coming up, so it might take some time -- but there is plenty of time left.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux