Re: [PATCH 19/50] locking/mutex: split out mutex_types.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/18/23 20:46, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:53:08AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
On 12/15/23 22:26, Kent Overstreet wrote:
-#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
Including rtmutex.h here means that mutex_types.h is no longer a simple
header for types only. So unless you also break out a rtmutex_types.h, it is
inconsistent.
good observation, I'll have to leave it for the next round of cleanups
though since the merge window is approaching and I'll have to redo all
the testing.

Besides, the kernel/sched code does use mutex_lock/unlock calls quite
frequently. With this patch, mutex.h will not be directly included. I
suspect that it is indirectly included via other header files. This may be
an issue with some configurations.
I've now put it through randconfig testing on every arch that debian
includes a compiler for (excluding sh and xtensa, which throw internal
compiler errors) and that one hasn't come up yet.

could still be included indirectly though - I haven't checked for that
one specifically yet.

If you are replacing mutex.h in include/linux/sched.h by mutex_types.h, I would suggest you add mutex.h to kernel/sched/sched.h to ensure this header file is included by the scheduler code.

Cheers,
Longman





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux