On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:30:55PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > Robin, Jean-Philippe -- do we need to make sure that the SMMU has completed > > its TLB invalidation before issuing an ATC invalidate? My half-baked worry > > is whether or not an ATS request could refill the ATC before the TLBI > > has completed, therefore rendering the ATC invalidation useless. > > I would agree, and the spec for CMD_ATC_INV does call out a > TLBI->sync->ATCI->sync sequence. At the moment the SVA notifier is issuing > its own command-based TLBIs anyway so the necessary sync is implicit there, > but if and when we get BTM support wired up properly it would be nice not to > have to bodge in an additional sync/DSB. Yes agreed, with BTM the CPU must call the notifier that issues ATC invalidation after completing the TLBI+DSB instructions. SMMU IHI0070F.a 3.9.1 ATS Interface Software must ensure that the SMMU TLB invalidation is complete before initiating the ATC invalidation. I'm guessing BTM will be enabled in the SMMU driver sometime soon, given that there already is one implementation in the wild that could use it. I think we didn't enable it because of the lack of separation between shared and private VMIDs, but that may now be solvable with the recent rework of the VMID allocator. Thanks, Jean
