Re: [PATCH v4] mm/memblock: fix overlapping allocation when doubling reserved array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:00:22 +0000
"Pearson, Greg" <greg.pearson@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I wasn't quite sure what to do about that at first either, I read 
> "Documentation/SubmittingPatches" and it says:
> 
> "The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
> development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path."
> 
> Since Yinghai contributed some code that is in the current version of 
> the patch I thought the "Signed-off-by" tag would be ok, but if 
> something else is more appropriate I have no problem re-cutting the 
> patch to make the chain of custody more clear.

Yup, we shouldn't expect people to be able to magically infer
fine-grained details such as this from hints embedded in the signoff
trail.  Fortunately we can write stuff in English ;)

I added

: This patch contains contributions from Yinghai Lu.

to the changelog.  Simple, huh? :)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]