On 2023/12/13 07:33, Nhat Pham wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 3:27 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Let's split the rbtree breakdown into a separate series. This series >> has irrelevant (and very nice) cleanups and optimizations, let's get >> them separately and defer the rbtree breakdown part until we get data Ok, will split and just send the cleanups/optimizations with dstmem reuse. >> about the xarray implementation. Perhaps the tree breakdown is not >> needed as much with an xarray, or at the very least the implementation >> would look different on top of an xarray. Yeah, will retest on the xarray version of Chris, the implementation is easy anyway. > > Actually, kinda agree - I quite like the cleanup/optimization done > w.r.t dstmem reuse :) Thanks!
