Re: [PATCH] cma: cached pageblock type fixup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:28:50PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2012 11:00:15 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] cma: cached pageblock type fixup
> > > 
> > > CMA pages added to per-cpu pages lists in free_hot_cold_page()
> > > have private field set to MIGRATE_CMA pageblock type .  If this
> > > happes just before start_isolate_page_range() in alloc_contig_range()
> > > changes pageblock type of the page to MIGRATE_ISOLATE it may result
> > > in the cached pageblock type being stale in free_pcppages_bulk()
> > > (which may be triggered by drain_all_pages() in alloc_contig_range()),
> > 
> > So what?
> 
> "page being added to MIGRATE_CMA free list instead of MIGRATE_ISOLATE
> one in __free_one_page() and (if the page is reused just before
> test_pages_isolated() check) causing alloc_contig_range() failure."
> 

And.... so what?

If it's on the wrong free list then it can still be isolated from that
list if it has not been allocated. If it has been allocated then it must
be a MIGRATE_CMA-compatible allocation so the page can be migrated and
the operation retried.

> > The pages get freed to the MIGRATE_CMA region. At worst they will be
> > used for an allocation request that is compatible with being migrated by
> > CMA. This will delay the allocation time of alloc_contig_range() but is
> > hardly critical.
> 
> There is no waiting on MIGRATE_CMA pages in alloc_contig_range() to
> become free again.  If the conversion to MIGRATE_ISOLATE fails then
> the whole alloc_contig_range() allocation fails on test_pages_isolated()
> check.
> 

Then retry the operation if alloc_contig_range() finds it raced.

> > Your fix on the other hand adds another call to get_pageblock_type() to
> > free_pcppages_bulk which is expensive. The change made to
> > buffered_rmqueue() is horrific. It takes the per-cpu page allocation
> > path and adds a spin lock to it which completely defeats the purpose of
> > having the per-cpu allocation avoid taking locks. This will have a very
> > heavy impact on performance, particularly on parallel workloads.
> > 
> > As the impact of the race should be marginal and the cost of the fix is
> > so unbelivably high I'm nacking this patch. If this race is a problem then
> > it should be handled in alloc_contig_range() not in the allocator fast paths.
> 
> Do you have any idea how this race can be handled in alloc_contig_range()?
> 

If the page is on the wrong free list, just isolate it or move it to the
MIGRATE_ISOLATE free list at that point. If it has been allocated then
migrate it and move the resulting free page to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE list.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]