On 12/5/23 07:06, Chengming Zhou wrote: > On 2023/12/5 05:41, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The current updated scheme (which this series implemented) is: >>> - node partial slabs: PG_Workingset && !frozen >>> - cpu partial slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen >>> - cpu slabs: !PG_Workingset && frozen >>> - full slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen >> >> The above would be good to include in the comments. >> >> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > Thanks for your review and suggestion! > > Maybe something like this: Thanks, added. > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index 623c17a4cdd6..21f88bd9c16b 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ > * by clearing the PG_workingset flag when moving out of the node > * partial list. Please see __slab_free() for more details. > * > + * To sum up, the current scheme is: > + * - node partial slab: PG_Workingset && !frozen > + * - cpu partial slab: !PG_Workingset && !frozen > + * - cpu slab: !PG_Workingset && frozen > + * - full slab: !PG_Workingset && !frozen > + * > * list_lock > * > * The list_lock protects the partial and full list on each node and