Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le 15/11/2023 à 22:37, Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:30:05 +0000 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> wrote:

However, the primary motivation for this change is to reduce the number
of tlb maintenance operations that the arm64 backend has to perform
during fork

Do you have a feeling for how much performance improved due to this?

Are there other architectures which might similarly benefit?  By
implementing ptep_set_wrprotects(), it appears.  If so, what sort of
gains might they see?


I think powerpc 8xx would benefit.

We have 16k hugepages which are implemented with 4 identical PTE which have the _PAGE_SPS bit set. _PAGE_SPS says it is a 16k page.

We have 512k hugepages which are implemented with 128 identical PTE which have _PAGE_HUGE bit set. _PAGE_HUGE tells it is a 512k page.

FWIW, PMD size is 4M and there is no 4M page size so no way to implement leaf PMD huge pages.

Christophe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux