[PATCH v3 3/7] mm, security: Fix missed security_task_movememory()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Considering that MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING or  mbind(2) using either
MPOL_MF_MOVE or MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL are capable of memory movement, it's
essential to include security_task_movememory() to cover this
functionality as well. It was identified during a code review.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 10a590ee1c89..1eafe81d782e 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1259,8 +1259,15 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
 	if (!new)
 		flags |= MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK;
 
-	if (flags & (MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL))
+	if (flags & (MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL)) {
+		err = security_task_movememory(current);
+		if (err) {
+			mpol_put(new);
+			return err;
+		}
 		lru_cache_disable();
+	}
+
 	{
 		NODEMASK_SCRATCH(scratch);
 		if (scratch) {
@@ -1450,6 +1457,8 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode,
 /* Basic parameter sanity check used by both mbind() and set_mempolicy() */
 static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	*flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
 	*mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
 
@@ -1460,6 +1469,9 @@ static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags)
 	if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) {
 		if (*mode != MPOL_BIND)
 			return -EINVAL;
+		err = security_task_movememory(current);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 		*flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON);
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux