On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Gang Li wrote: > > > > > And there, the 65.2s won't be noise because that 12TB system is up by a > > > snap > > > of a finger? :) > > > > > > > In this single boot test, total boot time was 373.78s, so 1GB hugetlb > > allocation is 17.4% of that. > > Thank you for sharing these data. Currently, I don't have access to a machine > of such large capacity, so the benefits in my tests are not as pronounced. > > I believe testing on a system of this scale would yield significant benefits. > > > > > Would love to see what the numbers would look like if 1GB pages were > > supported. > > > > Support for 1GB hugetlb is not yet perfect, so it wasn't included in v1. But > I'm happy to refine and introduce 1GB hugetlb support in future versions. > That would be very appreciated, thank you! I'm happy to test and collect data for any proposed patch series on 12TB systems booted with a lot of 1GB hugetlb pages on the kernel command line.
