Re: [PATCH RFC v2 19/27] mm: mprotect: Introduce PAGE_FAULT_ON_ACCESS for mprotect(PROT_MTE)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28.11.23 18:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.11.23 17:57, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
To enable tagging on a memory range, userspace can use mprotect() with the
PROT_MTE access flag. Pages already mapped in the VMA don't have the
associated tag storage block reserved, so mark the PTEs as
PAGE_FAULT_ON_ACCESS to trigger a fault next time they are accessed, and
reserve the tag storage on the fault path.

That sounds alot like fake PROT_NONE. Would there be a way to unify hat
handling and simply reuse pte_protnone()? For example, could we special
case on VMA flags?

Like, don't do NUMA hinting in these special VMAs. Then, have something
like:

if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte))
	return handle_pte_protnone(vmf);


Think out loud: maybe there isn't even the need to special-case on the VMA. Arch code should know it there is something to do. If not, it surely was triggered bu NUMA hinting. So maybe that could be handled in handle_pte_protnone() quite nicely.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux