Hi,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 08:49:57AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:52:56AM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I really appreciate you having a look!
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:03:22PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:56:58PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > > > It might be desirable for an architecture to modify the gfp flags used to
> > > > allocate the destination page for migration based on the page that it is
> > > > being replaced. For example, if an architectures has metadata associated
> > > > with a page (like arm64, when the memory tagging extension is implemented),
> > > > it can request that the destination page similarly has storage for tags
> > > > already allocated.
> > > >
> > > > No functional change.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/migrate.h | 4 ++++
> > > > mm/mempolicy.c | 2 ++
> > > > mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
> > > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > > > index 2ce13e8a309b..0acef592043c 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > > > @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ struct movable_operations {
> > > > /* Defined in mm/debug.c: */
> > > > extern const char *migrate_reason_names[MR_TYPES];
> > > >
> > > > +#ifndef arch_migration_target_gfp
> > > > +#define arch_migration_target_gfp(src, gfp) 0
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> > > >
> > > > void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l);
> > > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > index 10a590ee1c89..50bc43ab50d6 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > @@ -1182,6 +1182,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_migration_target_by_mpol(struct folio *src,
> > > >
> > > > h = folio_hstate(src);
> > > > gfp = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
> > > > + gfp |= arch_migration_target_gfp(src, gfp);
> > >
> > > I think it'll be more robust to have arch_migration_target_gfp() to modify
> > > the flags and return the new mask with added (or potentially removed)
> > > flags.
> >
> > I did it this way so an arch won't be able to remove flags set by the MM code.
> > There's a similar pattern in do_mmap() -> calc_vm_flag_bits() ->
> > arch_calc_vm_flag_bits().
>
> Ok, just add a sentence about it to the commit message.
Great, will do that!
Thanks,
Alex
>
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > >
> > > > nodemask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol, ilx, &nid);
> > > > return alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(h, nid, nodemask, gfp);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -1190,6 +1191,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_migration_target_by_mpol(struct folio *src,
> > > > gfp = GFP_TRANSHUGE;
> > > > else
> > > > gfp = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_COMP;
> > > > + gfp |= arch_migration_target_gfp(src, gfp);
> > > >
> > > > page = alloc_pages_mpol(gfp, order, pol, ilx, nid);
> > > > return page_rmappable_folio(page);
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Mike.
> > >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
