Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm/memory.c : cleanup the coding style issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 1b7dc66..195d6e1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2447,7 +2447,8 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  	return same;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src,
> +		unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * If the source page was a PFN mapping, we don't have

Nowadays, many developers prefer to declare a function in one line. and we don't think
this is incorrect anymore. so, I think this is intentional.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]