Re: [REGRESSION]: mmap performance regression starting with k-6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:04:28AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 07:15:34AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:38:18PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:07:40PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > > Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
> > > > 
> > > > #regzbot ^introduced: v6.0..v6.1
> > > 
> > > this is not a regression.  close it, you idiot.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > why?
> > 
> > Confused...
> 
> yes.  you're perpetually confused.  stop trying to help, you only make
> things worse.  learn about the things you work on, or give up.

Um, is this really called for?  Bagas is trying to help track
regressions, and if something isn't a regression like you say here, a
simple "This is not a regression, it's already resolved in newer
kernels" is fine.

Resorting to insults on the reporter is not ok.

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux