Re: [PATCH v2] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:57:02 +0000
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, opensource.kernel@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231121075129.1530-1-justinjiang@vivo.com>
References: <20231121075129.1530-1-justinjiang@vivo.com>

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:51:29PM +0800, Zhiguo Jiang wrote:
> Update comments and modify variable highatomic_allocation to highatomic.

You sent the patch relative to your last patch again.
You have to send the patch relative to Linus' tree or Andrew's tree.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue
  - From: zhiguojiang

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 2/4] fs: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/
Previous by thread: [PATCH] pgtable: do not expose _refcount field via ptdesc
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux