Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/14/2023 1:01 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>

migrate_pages() supports >0 order folio migration and during compaction,
even if compaction_alloc() cannot provide >0 order free pages,
migrate_pages() can split the source page and try to migrate the base pages
from the split. It can be a baseline and start point for adding support for
compacting >0 order folios.

Suggested-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/compaction.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 01ba298739dd..5217dd35b493 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -816,6 +816,21 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct compact_control *cc)
  	return too_many;
  }
+/*
+ * 1. if the page order is larger than or equal to target_order (i.e.,
+ * cc->order and when it is not -1 for global compaction), skip it since
+ * target_order already indicates no free page with larger than target_order
+ * exists and later migrating it will most likely fail;
+ *
+ * 2. compacting > pageblock_order pages does not improve memory fragmentation,
+ * skip them;
+ */
+static bool skip_isolation_on_order(int order, int target_order)
+{
+	return (target_order != -1 && order >= target_order) ||
+		order >= pageblock_order;
+}
+
  /**
   * isolate_migratepages_block() - isolate all migrate-able pages within
   *				  a single pageblock
@@ -1009,7 +1024,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
  		/*
  		 * Regardless of being on LRU, compound pages such as THP and
  		 * hugetlbfs are not to be compacted unless we are attempting
-		 * an allocation much larger than the huge page size (eg CMA).
+		 * an allocation larger than the compound page size.
  		 * We can potentially save a lot of iterations if we skip them
  		 * at once. The check is racy, but we can consider only valid
  		 * values and the only danger is skipping too much.
@@ -1017,11 +1032,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
  		if (PageCompound(page) && !cc->alloc_contig) {
  			const unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
- if (likely(order <= MAX_ORDER)) {
-				low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
-				nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1;
+			/*
+			 * Skip based on page order and compaction target order
+			 * and skip hugetlbfs pages.
+			 */
+			if (skip_isolation_on_order(order, cc->order) ||
+			    PageHuge(page)) {
+				if (order <= MAX_ORDER) {
+					low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
+					nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1;
+				}
+				goto isolate_fail;
  			}
-			goto isolate_fail;
  		}
/*
@@ -1144,17 +1166,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
  					goto isolate_abort;
  				}
  			}
+		}
- /*
-			 * folio become large since the non-locked check,
-			 * and it's on LRU.
-			 */
-			if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio) && !cc->alloc_contig)) {
-				low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
-				nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
-				folio_set_lru(folio);
-				goto isolate_fail_put;
-			}
+		/*
+		 * Check LRU folio order under the lock
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(skip_isolation_on_order(folio_order(folio),
+						     cc->order) &&
+			     !cc->alloc_contig)) {
+			low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
+			nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
+			folio_set_lru(folio);
+			goto isolate_fail_put;
  		}

Why was this part moved out of the 'if (lruvec != locked)' block? If we hold the lru lock, then we do not need to check again, right?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux