On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:48:57AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > Maybe Christoph is playing with min_slab_order or something, so we're > > > getting 8 pages per slab. That's still only 2496 bytes. Why are we > > > calling into the large kmalloc path? What's really going on here? > > > > Christoph? > > Sorry I thought I already answered that. > > This was a boot with slub_min_order=5 that was inadvertently left in from a > performance test. Ah. So do you think we need to fix this?
