Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC flag allocation issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:04:49AM +0800, zhiguojiang wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2023/11/11 14:25, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:49:54AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu,  9 Nov 2023 15:31:33 +0800 Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Add a new bool* argument to pass return flag instead of *alloc_flags
> > > > and add the related comments.
> > > Please retain (and update) the changelog with each version of a patch.
> > > 
> > > For reviewers (please), here's the v1 changelog:
> > This patch isn't diffed against the current tree.  It can't be reviewed.
> patch v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231108065408.1861-1-justinjiang@xxxxxxxx/
> patch v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231109073133.792-2-justinjiang@xxxxxxxx/
> patch v3:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231110020840.1031-1-justinjiang@xxxxxxxx/

None of those are diffed against the current tree.  You need to send a
patch that applies cleanly to either linux-next or current Linus head.
Not a patch on top of an earlier version of your patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux