Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:11:41 +0100
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx, hughd@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxx, fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com>
References: <9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:47:24PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid such a major fault?

man madvise

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

References:
- [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
  - From: zhangpeng (AS)

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] mm/rmap: implement anonmap allocate post callback for page_owner
Next by Date: Re: high kswapd CPU usage with symmetrical swap in/out pattern with multi-gen LRU
Previous by thread: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
Next by thread: Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux