On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:49:16 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:22:27AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Peter, how can you say we can get rid of cond_resched() in NONE when you > > Because that would fix none to actually be none. Who cares. Well, that would lead to regressions with PREEMPT_NONE and the watchdog timer. > > > > Look at my PoC: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87jzshhexi.ffs@tglx/ > > > > And I've been saying that many times already ;-) > > Why should I look at random patches on the interweb to make sense of > these patches here? I actually said it to others, this wasn't really supposed to be addressed to you. > > That just underlines these here patches are not making sense. It's a complex series, and there's a lot of room for improvement. I'm happy to help out here. -- Steve
