On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:15:11 +0800 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > lib/crc32test.c | 2 -- > > lib/crypto/mpi/mpi-pow.c | 1 - > > lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 5 ----- > > lib/random32.c | 1 - > > lib/rhashtable.c | 2 -- > > lib/test_bpf.c | 3 --- > > lib/test_lockup.c | 2 +- > > lib/test_maple_tree.c | 8 -------- > > lib/test_rhashtable.c | 10 ---------- > > 9 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 33 deletions(-) > > Nack. A "Nack" with no commentary is completely useless and borderline offensive. What is your rationale for the Nack? The cond_resched() is going away if the patches earlier in the series gets implemented. So either it is removed from your code, or it will become a nop, and just wasting bits in the source tree. Your choice. -- Steve
