Re: [RFC PATCH 40/86] context_tracking: add ct_state_cpu()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:57:26PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
> While making up its mind about whether to reschedule a target
> runqueue eagerly or lazily, resched_curr() needs to know if the
> target is executing in the kernel or in userspace.
> 
> Add ct_state_cpu().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Using context-tracking for this seems like overkill. Is there a better
> way to achieve this? One problem with depending on user_enter() is that
> it happens much too late for our purposes. From the scheduler's
> point-of-view the exit state has effectively transitioned once the
> task exits the exit_to_user_loop() so we will see stale state
> while the task is done with exit_to_user_loop() but has not yet
> executed user_enter().
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/context_tracking_state.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/Kconfig.preempt                 |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h b/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> index bbff5f7f8803..6a8f1c7ba105 100644
> --- a/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> +++ b/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,13 @@ static __always_inline int __ct_state(void)
>  {
>  	return raw_atomic_read(this_cpu_ptr(&context_tracking.state)) & CT_STATE_MASK;
>  }
> +
> +static __always_inline int __ct_state_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct context_tracking *ct = per_cpu_ptr(&context_tracking, cpu);
> +
> +	return atomic_read(&ct->state) & CT_STATE_MASK;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_IDLE
> @@ -139,6 +146,20 @@ static __always_inline int ct_state(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static __always_inline int ct_state_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!context_tracking_enabled_cpu(cpu))
> +		return CONTEXT_DISABLED;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	ret = __ct_state_cpu(cpu);
> +	preempt_enable();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

Those preempt_disable/enable are pointless.

But this patch is problematic, you do *NOT* want to rely on context
tracking. Context tracking adds atomics to the entry path, this is slow
and even with CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING it is disabled until you configure
the NOHZ_FULL nonsense.

This simply cannot be.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux