> 3. Testing > ========== > We just did some simple testing on a server with 128 CPUs (2 nodes) to > compare performance for now. > > - perf bench sched messaging -g 5 -t -l 100000 > baseline RFC > 7.042s 6.966s > 7.022s 7.045s > 7.054s 6.985s > > - stress-ng --rawpkt 128 --rawpkt-ops 100000000 > baseline RFC > 2.42s 2.15s > 2.45s 2.16s > 2.44s 2.17s Looks like these numbers are carried over from the first RFC. Could you please retest with v4 as there were some bigger changes (i.e. getting rid of acquire_slab()). Otherwise I think v5 can drop "RFC" and will add it to slab tree after the merge window and 6.7-rc1. Thanks! > It shows above there is about 10% improvement on stress-ng rawpkt > testcase, although no much improvement on perf sched bench testcase. > > Thanks for any comment and code review! > > Chengming Zhou (9): > slub: Reflow ___slab_alloc() > slub: Change get_partial() interfaces to return slab > slub: Keep track of whether slub is on the per-node partial list > slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node > partial list > slub: Introduce freeze_slab() > slub: Delay freezing of partial slabs > slub: Optimize deactivate_slab() > slub: Rename all *unfreeze_partials* functions to *put_partials* > slub: Update frozen slabs documentations in the source > > mm/slub.c | 381 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- > 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-) >
