On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 01:22:02PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > +static int adjust_page_size(void)
> > > +{
> > > + page_size = default_huge_page_size();
> >
> > This is hacky too, currently page_size is the real page_size backing the
> > memory.
> >
> > To make thp test simple, maybe just add one more test to MOVE a large chunk
> > to replace the thp test, which may contain a few thps? It also doesn't
> > need to be fault based.
>
> Sorry, I didn't get your suggestion. Could you please clarify? Which
> thp test are you referring to?
The new "move-pmd" test.
I meant maybe it makes sense to have one separate MOVE test for when one
ioctl(MOVE) covers a large range which can cover some thps. Then that will
trigger thp paths. Assuming the fault paths are already covered in the
generic "move" test.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
