On 26/10/2023 15:15, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > n 26/10/2023 16:13, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:57:27 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:04 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:43:10 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +cc Andrew: Would you mind taking this patchset in your tree for the >>>>> next rc? This patchset depends on a previous fix for arm64 that you >>>>> merged in rc4 which is not in the riscv -fixes branch yet. >>>>> >>>>> I saw with Palmer and he should ack this shortly. >>>> Well I grabbed them into mm.git's mm-hotfixes-unstable queue. All >>>> being well I'll move them into mm-hotfixes-stable within a week then >>>> into Linus shortly after. >>> Those fixes finally did not make it to 6.6, I was hoping for them to >>> land in -rc6 or -rc7: for the future, what should have I done to avoid >>> that? >> They're merged in Linus's tree. >> >> 6f1bace9a9fb arm64: hugetlb: fix set_huge_pte_at() to work with all swap entries >> 935d4f0c6dc8 mm: hugetlb: add huge page size param to set_huge_pte_at() > > > Oops, sorry, I missed them this morning! Those two patches that Andrew highlights are the fix I did for arm64. Weren't you referring to the corresponding patches you did for riscv, Alex? > > Thanks, > > Alex >
