Re: [PATCH] kpageflags: respect folio head-page flag placement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 16:12 -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> 
> +++ b/fs/proc/page.c
> @@ -188,20 +188,31 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page)
>                 u |= 1 << KPF_SLAB;
>  
>         u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ERROR,         PG_error);
> -       u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_DIRTY,         PG_dirty);
> +
> +       if (PageDirty(page))
> +               u |= 1 << KPF_DIRTY;
> +
>         u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_UPTODATE,      PG_uptodate);
>         u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_WRITEBACK,     PG_writeback);
>  
> -       u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_LRU,           PG_lru);
> -       u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_REFERENCED,    PG_referenced);
> -       u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ACTIVE,        PG_active);
> +       if (PageLRU(page))
> +               u |= 1 << KPF_LRU;
> +
> +       if (PageReferenced(page))
> +               u |= 1 << KPF_REFERENCED;
> +
> +       if (PageActive(page))
> +               u |= 1 << KPF_ACTIVE;
> +
>         u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_RECLAIM,       PG_reclaim);
>  
>         if (PageSwapCache(page))
>                 u |= 1 << KPF_SWAPCACHE;
>         u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_SWAPBACKED,    PG_swapbacked);
> 

Aren't PG_locked, PG_reclaim, and PG_swapbacked also maintained only on
the folio/head?

Would it make sense to convert those over as well?

-- 
All Rights Reversed.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux