On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:00 AM Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +static void depot_keep_next_pool(void **prealloc)
> > {
> > /*
> > - * If the next pool is already initialized or the maximum number of
> > + * If the next pool is already saved or the maximum number of
> > * pools is reached, do not use the preallocated memory.
> > */
> > if (!next_pool_required)
> It's not mentioned at the top of the file that next_pool_required is
> protected by pool_lock, but it is, correct?
> Can you please update the comment to reflect that?
I'll add a clarifying comment above this access to the previous patch.
I don't think it's worth to describe all locking intricacies of the
existing code in other places, as atomic accesses are removed
altogether later in the series anyway.
Thanks!
