On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:59:12AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:49:15AM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:36 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:14:36 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > This was changed from find_lock_page() which returns NULL to > > > > filemap_lock_folio() which returns error pointers. Update the > > > > error checking to match. > > > > > > > > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c > > > > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c > > > > @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, > > > > > > > > folio = filemap_lock_folio(vma->vm_file->f_mapping, > > > > linear_page_index(vma, haddr)); > > > > - if (!folio) > > > > + if (IS_ERR(folio)) > > > > return SCAN_PAGE_NULL; > > > > > > > > if (folio_order(folio) != HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) { > > > > > > Also doesn't appear applicable to current kernels? > > > > Thanks for these. Both these fix patches address issues introduced by my > > khugepaged folio conversion patchset: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231018203213.50224-1-vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > > > Andrew already dropped the patchset from current kernels so I can fix a > > couple issues, v3 will include all these fixes. > > > Only this one was introduced by your patchset. The other bug is older. > I don't know why it only showed up as a new bug now. I had guessed that > it was other changes I had made to Smatch which affected this. Heh. Nope. I was wrong. These were both introduces as part of the folio conversion patchset. Thanks for taking care of this, Vishal. regards, dan carpenter