Currently, function should_fail() has "bool" for its return value, so
it's reasonable to change the return value of function should_fail_alloc_page()
into "bool" as well.
The patch does cleanup on function should_fail_alloc_page() to have "bool"
for its return value.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 4403009..7892f84 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1529,16 +1529,16 @@ static int __init setup_fail_page_alloc(char *str)
}
__setup("fail_page_alloc=", setup_fail_page_alloc);
-static int should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
+static bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
{
if (order < fail_page_alloc.min_order)
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_highmem && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM))
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (fail_page_alloc.ignore_gfp_wait && (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
- return 0;
+ return false;
return should_fail(&fail_page_alloc.attr, 1 << order);
}
@@ -1578,9 +1578,9 @@ late_initcall(fail_page_alloc_debugfs);
#else /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */
-static inline int should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
+static inline bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
{
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>