On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:19:01 +0000 SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:49:19 +0000 SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The maximum nr_accesses of given DAMON context can be calculated by > > dividing the aggregation interval by the sampling interval. Some logics > > in DAMON uses the maximum nr_accesses as a divisor. Hence, the value > > shouldn't be zero. Such case is avoided since DAMON avoids setting the > > agregation interval as samller than the sampling interval. However, > > since nr_accesses is unsigned int while the intervals are unsigned long, > > the maximum nr_accesses could be zero while casting. > > Actually, the issue was reported by Jakub, and I didn't add 'Reported-by:' tags > for him. I sure Andrew could add that on his own, but I want to minimize > Andrew's load, so will send v2 of this patchset. Andrew, please let me know if > that doesn't help but only increasing your load. So sent the second version[1] with the "Reported-by: akub Acs <acsjakub@xxxxxxxxx>" line, but then I noticed the patch is already added to mm queue[2]. Somehow the notification mails delivered bit later than usual. Sorry for making this noise, Andrew. Please add "Reported-by: akub Acs <acsjakub@xxxxxxxxx>" to already added patches, or replace those with the v2 if possible. Also, please let me know if there's anything I could help. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20231020172317.64192-1-sj@xxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20231020171847.C6EEAC433C7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks, SJ > > > Thanks, > SJ >