The SunRPC stack manages pages (and eventually, folios) via an
array of struct biovec items within struct xdr_buf. We have not
fully committed to replacing the struct page array in xdr_buf
because, although the socket API supports biovec arrays, the RDMA
stack uses struct scatterlist rather than struct biovec.
This (incomplete) series explores what it might look like if the
RDMA core API could support struct biovec array arguments. The
series compiles on x86, but I haven't tested it further. I'm posting
early in hopes of starting further discussion.
Are there other upper layer API consumers, besides SunRPC, who might
prefer the use of biovec over scatterlist?
Besides handling folios as well as single pages in bv_page, what
other work might be needed in the DMA layer?
What RDMA core APIs should be converted? IMO a DMA mapping and
registration API for biovecs would be needed. Maybe RDMA Read and
Write too?
---
Chuck Lever (9):
dma-debug: Fix a typo in a debugging eye-catcher
bvec: Add bio_vec fields to manage DMA mapping
dma-debug: Add dma_debug_ helpers for mapping bio_vec arrays
mm: kmsan: Add support for DMA mapping bio_vec arrays
dma-direct: Support direct mapping bio_vec arrays
DMA-API: Add dma_sync_bvecs_for_cpu() and dma_sync_bvecs_for_device()
DMA: Add dma_map_bvecs_attrs()
iommu/dma: Support DMA-mapping a bio_vec array
RDMA: Add helpers for DMA-mapping an array of bio_vecs
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 368 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 58 ++++++
include/linux/bvec.h | 143 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 8 +
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 9 +
include/linux/iommu.h | 4 +
include/linux/kmsan.h | 20 ++
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 29 +++
kernel/dma/debug.c | 165 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/dma/debug.h | 38 ++++
kernel/dma/direct.c | 92 +++++++++
kernel/dma/direct.h | 17 ++
kernel/dma/mapping.c | 93 +++++++++
mm/kmsan/hooks.c | 13 ++
14 files changed, 1056 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Chuck Lever
