On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:55:30PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > David Rientjes didn't like HugetTLB limit to be a memcg extension and > > wanted this to be a separate controller. I posted a v7 version that did > > HugeTLB limit as a separate controller and used page cgroup to track > > HugeTLB cgroup. Kamezawa Hiroyuki didn't like the usage of page_cgroup > > in HugeTLB controller( http://mid.gmane.org/4FCD648E.90709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ) > > > > Yes, and thank you very much for working on v8 to remove the dependency on > page_cgroup and to seperate this out. I think it will benefit users who > don't want to enable all of memcg but still want to account and restrict > hugetlb page usage, and I think the code seperation is much cleaner > internally. > I have V9 ready to post. Only change I have against v8 is to fix the compund_order comparison and folding the charge/uncharge patches with its users. I will wait for your review feedback before posting V9 so that I can address the review comments in V9. Once we get V9 out we can get the series added to -mm ? > I'll review that patchset and suggest that the old hugetlb extension in > -mm be dropped in the interim. > I also agree with dropping the old hugetlb extension patchset in -mm. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>