On Wed, Oct 18 2023 at 10:51, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 05:09:46AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote: Can you folks please trim your replies. It's annoying to scroll through hundreds of quoted lines to figure out that nothing is there. >> This probably allows for more configuration flexibility across archs? >> Would allow for TREE_RCU=y, for instance. That said, so far I've only >> been working with PREEMPT_RCU=y.) > > Then this is a bug that needs to be fixed. We need a way to make > RCU readers non-preemptible. Why?
