On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:29:50PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote: > > The kmemleak object is allocated by mem_pool_alloc(), which > > could be from slab or mem_pool[], so it's not suitable using > > __kmem_cache_free() to free the object, use __mem_pool_free() > > instead. > > > > Fixes: 0647398a8c7b ("mm: kmemleak: simple memory allocation pool for kmemleak objects") > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Could you please reorder this patch before the previous one? If you > added a Fixes tag, we may want a cc stable as well (as for the other > patches with a Fixes tag) and it makes more sense to backport it on its > own without the __create_object() split. Otherwise: Ah, ignore this. If we want a cc stable, the whole thing needs backporting, including the split which is essential for the subsequent fix. > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> -- Catalin