* Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > While I agree with dropping the limitation, and I agree that > > 9391a3f9c7f1 should have provided more of a justification, I believe a > > core MM fix is in order as well, for it to not crash. [ If it's fixed > > upstream already, please reference the relevant commit ID. ] > > Agree. I posted a fixed patchset[1] before, maybe we can reconsider it. > :) > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230215152412.13368-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > For memoryless node, this patchset skip it and fallback to other nodes > when build its zonelists. Mind resubmitting that to the MM folks, with the NULL dereference crash mentioned prominently? Feel free to Cc: me. Fixing hypothetical robustness problems is good, fixing specific crashes is better. :-) Thanks, Ingo
