Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 20:53:05 +0800
Cc: <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@xxxxxxxxx>, Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAC_iWj+FR+ojP7akSY0azc0hVnrhsPhyFTejNit0sVR742KgEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20231013064827.61135-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20231013064827.61135-2-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <CAC_iWj+FR+ojP7akSY0azc0hVnrhsPhyFTejNit0sVR742KgEw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0

On 2023/10/17 20:17, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
>>
> 
> That looks fine wrt what we discussed with Jakub,
> 
> Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks. What about other patches in this series? Could you take
some time to review them too?

> 
> .
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
  - From: Ilias Apalodimas

References:
- [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
  - From: Yunsheng Lin
- Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
  - From: Ilias Apalodimas

Prev by Date: [linux-next:master 12600/13086] security/landlock/net.h:28:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fix confusion around MAX_ORDER
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] page_pool: fragment API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]