On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:09:42PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 2023/2/15 17:30, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > How about we try this:
> >
> > From b670120bcacd3fe34a40d7179c70ca2ab69279e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:12:18 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: drop 4MB restriction on minimal NUMA node size
> >
> > Qi Zheng reports crashes in a production environment and provides a
> > simplified example as a reproducer:
> >
> > For example, if we use qemu to start a two NUMA node kernel,
> > one of the nodes has 2M memory (less than NODE_MIN_SIZE),
> > and the other node has 2G, then we will encounter the
> > following panic:
> >
> > [ 0.149844] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> > [ 0.150783] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> > [ 0.151488] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> > <...>
> > [ 0.156056] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x40
> > <...>
> > [ 0.169781] Call Trace:
> > [ 0.170159] <TASK>
> > [ 0.170448] deactivate_slab+0x187/0x3c0
> > [ 0.171031] ? bootstrap+0x1b/0x10e
> > [ 0.171559] ? preempt_count_sub+0x9/0xa0
> > [ 0.172145] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x12c/0x440
> > [ 0.172735] ? bootstrap+0x1b/0x10e
> > [ 0.173236] bootstrap+0x6b/0x10e
> > [ 0.173720] kmem_cache_init+0x10a/0x188
> > [ 0.174240] start_kernel+0x415/0x6ac
> > [ 0.174738] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xe0/0xeb
> > [ 0.175417] </TASK>
> > [ 0.175713] Modules linked in:
> > [ 0.176117] CR2: 0000000000000000
> >
> > The crashes happen because of inconsistency between nodemask that has
> > nodes with less than 4MB as memoryless and the actual memory fed into
> > core mm.
> >
> > The commit 9391a3f9c7f1 ("[PATCH] x86_64: Clear more state when ignoring
> > empty node in SRAT parsing") that introduced minimal size of a NUMA node
> > does not explain why a node size cannot be less than 4MB and what boot
> > failures this restriction might fix.
> >
> > Since then a lot has changed and core mm won't confuse badly about small
> > node sizes.
> >
> > Drop the limitation for the minimal node size.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230212110305.93670-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 7 -------
> > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 7 -------
> > 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> What's the current progress on this patch? This patch doesn't seem to be
> merged into any trees. Did I miss something?
Looks like it fell between the cracks. I'll resend.
> Thanks,
> Qi
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
