On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 10:40 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.10.23 07:53, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 17:04 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 07.10.23 10:55, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > > > Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
<..>
> > +
> > + for (cur_start = start; cur_start < start + size;
> > + cur_start += memblock_size) {
> > + if (walk_memory_blocks(cur_start, memblock_size, &mem,
> > + test_has_altmap_cb))
> > + num_altmaps++;
> > + else
> > + num_no_altmaps++;
> > + }
>
> You should do that without the outer loop, by doing the counting in the
> callback function instead.
>
>
I made a new callback, since the existing callback that returns the
memory_block breaks the walk the first time an altmap was encountered.
Agreed on all the other comments - it looks much cleaner now!
Sending v6 shortly with all of this.
