Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add a __GFP_SLABMEMCG flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2012 11:31 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Please make this conditional on CONFIG_MEMCG or so. The bit can be useful
in particular on 32 bit architectures.
Looking at how __GFP_NOTRACK works - which is also ifdef'd, the bit it uses is skipped if that is not defined, which I believe is a sane thing to do.

Given that, I don't see the point of conditionally defining the memcg bit, It basically means that the only way we can reuse the bit saved is by making a future feature fundamentally incompatible with memcg.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]