On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 10:33:17AM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote: > With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead. > And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate > prefixes, which looks like: > > kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____)) > kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x(____ptrval____)) > kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000) > > Use 0x%px instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer. Then the print > will be like: > > kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0xffff9111c145b020) > kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x00000000000333b0) > kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0000000a1af80000) > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
