Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: Replace xfs_isilocked with xfs_assert_locked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> To use the new rwsem_assert_held()/rwsem_assert_held_write(), we can't
> use the existing ASSERT macro.
> 
> xfs_assert_ilocked(ip,  XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL) checks both the
> IOLOCK and the ILOCK are held for write.  xfs_isilocked() only checked
> that the ILOCK was held for write.
> 
> xfs_assert_ilocked() is always on, even if DEBUG or XFS_WARN aren't
> defined.  It's a cheap check, so I don't think it's worth defining
> it away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
......

> -bool
> -xfs_isilocked(
> +void
> +xfs_assert_ilocked(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
>  	uint			lock_flags)
>  {
> -	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
> -		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED))
> -			return !!ip->i_lock.mr_writer;
> -		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
> -		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock,
> -				(lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED));
> -	}
> -
> -	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
> -		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
> -				(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED));
> -	}
> -
> -	ASSERT(0);
> -	return false;
> +	if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)
> +		rwsem_assert_held(&ip->i_lock.mr_lock);
> +	else if (lock_flags & XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)
> +		BUG_ON(!ip->i_lock.mr_writer);

		ASSERT(!ip->i_lock.mr_writer);

Otherwise OK.

-Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux